Tuesday, November 18, 2014

Sermon for Christ the King Sunday: St Matthew 25:31-46

The Division at the Judgment
detail from a larger mosaic in Ravenna

Today's Gospel is not a picture of the simple Galilean carpenter and itinerant Rabbi.  Rather it is the prophesy of the return of the King to judge the nations.  Everyone will be there, everyone who has ever lived, and the Son of Man will be revealed as the King of Glory.  The angels will be with him, and he will be seated on his throne, and we shall all stand before him to hear his righteous judgment. Even as the Son of Man and King of Glory, he remains the great and Good Shepherd, and on that day he will divide us who pasture together into two groups, characterized in today's Gospel as sheep and goats.

Now sheep, particularly in the ancient world, were very useful animals.  They provided meat and wool, and even milk.  They were a staple of the economy, and their fertility, their relative domesticity,  and ability to graze in some of the harshest conditions insured the economic viability of the community.  Goats on the other hand were another story. Goats, while still of some value, were far less profitable, and there were other issues as well.  Their stubbornness, evil odor, and lustful aggression has long made them the very emblem of evil in the world.  They may look amazingly cute at the fair, cleaned and penned- but let me assure you that a Billy  at breeding time is a disturbing and disgusting sight to behold.  And yes, I speak from experience. 

But what is the meaning of this division?  Commentators ancient and modern agree.  Here our Lord and rightful Sovereign Jesus Christ sets forth love as the ultimate test of  true discipleship.  This love is not merely a sentiment, but a series of measurable actions which grow out of an heart which shows forth the holiness and concern for others that are evident in God's gift of Jesus Christ to be the Saviour of the world.  Judgment at the end of the age will consider whether or not we have treated others as Christ treated us.  It is a serious basis for comparison, and a high standard indeed.  The language itself allows us no escape from the reality that is the love of God.  We are not given the luxury of redefining words or parsing grammar in a way that lessens our responsibility.  We are called to a common humanity that exhibits the very character of God.  The words generally translated "you welcomed me," actually mean "you welcomed me into your home, into the bosom of your family."  There is not much wiggle room there.  How are we doing?  Is it uncomfortable yet?  Now, a strict reading of the grammar would seem to imply that the people in whom we serve Jesus are Christians in need, but the blessed Fathers are of one mind and voice when they say that as Jesus lives in the needs of his church, his church lives in the needs of all people, whether or not they are at the time of their need named as members of his one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.

We are all  made in the image of God, and he expects us all to exhibit that basic humanity which Charles Dickens calls, "the milk of human kindness."  It is not optional, and no excuses will be allowed at the great judgment.  Granted, Christians may occasionally differ about the best way to show this common humanity.  There will be honest disagreement about what constitutes actual acts of mercy and what constitutes the enabling of bad behavior, but whatever political or philosophical disagreements we Christians may have about how best to accomplish the love of God in the world, the requirement remains that we cannot ignore basic human need around us.  If we do, we are ignoring the presence of our true King.  If we ignore him in this world, we will be rejected as unfit in the world to come, and will go away into eternal punishment, into that place of eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.   But if we truly model love by our attitudes and our actions here in this world, our discipleship will be vindicated and proved true, and we will inherit the kingdom prepared for us from the foundation of the world. 

In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.

Com'on Dad, Let's Hunt!

Rector's Rambling, December 2014

Oscar Doing What He Was Bred and Trained To Do!
Cold brings out the best in dogs of all kinds, and Oscar is no exception.  The woods were magical today, and the game was running.  The temperature hung somewhere in the mid teens in the early afternoon, and I was due a break after the responsibilities of last week's Diocesan Convention- so, I think everyone who knows me knows where I was and what I was doing, with faithful Oscar out front all the way. 

Winter has always been my favorite season, and I do love the snow.  But as CS Lewis points out in "The Lion, The Witch, and The Wardrobe," winter without Christmas just wouldn't be the same.  For those of us who grew up in northern climes, the snow means that our celebration of the Birth of Jesus is just around the corner, and I for one can't wait.  When my world was characterized by barrenness and cold and bone chilling hardship, God sent his only Son into the world to bring me life, and warmth, and plenty.  In short, he saved me and named me as his own, and then Jesus wrapped his arms around me and called me his brother and his friend. 

When we were walking through the woods today, the branches hung low with the burden of the snow, and as I moved through the tangle, a gallon or two of snow fell from the trees and went right down my back.  It was invigorating to say the least, but when we finally got back to the house, the warmth and wetness was almost comforting in a primal sort of way.  I could not help but think of the warming love of God which over the years has melted my icy heart and helped me to be so  much more than I could ever have been on my own.

I hope that all of you, my friends, have a blessed Christmas this year.  Remember that our Christmas Eve services are at 4  & 10:30, and on Christmas Day we will gather at 11AM.  I look forward to seeing you there, and to celebrating together the coming of Jesus into the world to bring us warmth, and healing, and salvation.

Saturday, November 8, 2014

Reflection on II Timothy 1:12b


To be delivered at St. John's on November 9th, God willing.

St. Paul writing (perhaps to Timothy?)
probably by Valentin de Boulogne, 17th century

One of the great formative influences in my early life was singing what I believed.  Sometimes those songs still ring in my ears, and I find myself singing along.  One of my favorites was always “I Know Whom I Have Believed” by Daniel W. Whittle, published in1883.  It goes in part something like this:

I know not why God’s wondrous grace
To me He hath made known,
Nor why, unworthy, Christ in love
Redeemed me for His own.   
    • But “I know Whom I have believed,
    • And am persuaded that He is able
    • To keep that which I’ve committed
    • Unto Him against that day.”
I know not when my Lord may come,
At night or noonday fair,
Nor if I walk the vale with Him,
Or meet Him in the air.
    • But “I know Whom I have believed,
    • And am persuaded that He is able
    • To keep that which I’ve committed
    • Unto Him against that day.”

I’m sure some of you noticed that this is a quote  from the Authorized Version of the Bible,  The Second Epistle of Paul the Apostle to Timothy, Chapter one, verse 12b.

I have come to the conclusion that one of the reasons this particular song, and this particular verse of Scripture has been so ubiquitous this week is because of an article entitled “Evangelicals’ Favorite Heresies” in the November 2014 Issue of “Christianity Today.”  The good news is that more than 9 in 10 believe that Jesus rose from the dead and that heaven and hell are real.  I doubt that Main Line Protestant samplings would fare so well.  Some of the more disturbing findings about Evangelical Christians are: 27% either agree or couldn’t deny for sure that Jesus, while the first of creation, is a created being.  58% consider the Holy Spirit to be a force, and not a personal being.  A whopping 77% believe that people seek God first, and then God responds with grace.   A smaller, but still significant 24% are willing to believe that the Book of Mormon might be a revelation from God.  

Another issue that has had doctrine and the methodology by which it is discovered and developed on my mind this week is our own upcoming Diocesan Convention in Chillicothe.  The third resolution proposes that  our Diocesan Convention memorialize the General Convention to modify the marriage ceremony in the Book of Common Prayer in a way that replaces the words “husband and wife” or “man and woman” with the phrase “these two persons.”  Whatever one’s opinion might be on the issue, and whether or not it passes,  The proposal would be a major change in the historic position of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church, and of how the Church has always interpreted the Bible.  But for the purposes of today’s line of thought, I would ask you to temporarily set aside the issue of same sex union in the Episcopal or any other Church.  Rather I would ask you to think about the ecclesiology, that is the belief about what the church is, which gives rise to such a resolution as resolution three, or for that matter, which allows so many of our Evangelical brethren and sisters to deny the received understandings about our Lord, about the Trinity, about Salvation, and about Revelation.  

Resolution three arises from the commonly held belief that a simple majority vote in constitutional process, taken in a relatively small denomination in one time and place, is sufficient justification for making a major change in the patrimony of the church.  Without consultation with our Roman Catholic, or Protestant, or Orthodox, or Coptic fellow believers, we are willing to declare that what belongs to all of us is ours to modify at will.  That is a dangerous position to take, because it points out the falseness of our membership in the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church by rending the fabric of the broader Christian community, which is the body of Christ, and which we claim to be a part of every time we say the Creed.  It is virtually the same position assumed by that individual Evangelical Believer who affirmed to the pollsters that Jesus Was a created Being or that our desires rather than God’s love initiates and enables our reconciliation with God.  We live in a world where individuals and small groups feel very free to place their own feelings and thoughts and impulses above those of the broader Christian community, with little regard for unintended consequences.  Anyone can say that they are a part of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church.  To submit to the Church and actually be so is another thing entirely.

This brings us back to Second Timothy 1:12.  Archbishop Paul is writing to admonish and instruct young Bishop Timothy.  The Apostle claims his authority from Jesus with confidence, and continues his statement of Creedal Orthodoxy from the First Letter, in which he had addressed many specific organizational and moral and relational implications of the faith Jesus left to the Apostles.  Two phrases stand out to me in this particular verse which seem to have bearing on our present situation.  First, he says “I know whom I have believed.”  His faith is grounded in the sure and living relationship that he shares with God through Jesus Christ in the power of the Holy Spirit.  God’s grace had been manifest in his education and upbringing, in the example of blessed Stephen, the protomartyr, in the loving example of Barnabas and the congregation in Antioch who welcomed him into the Faith he had persecuted.  Then there was the blessed time apart, and so many other things which had caused his certainty of the reality of God to grow and deepen.  And now he called his young protege to share in that same certainty.  It is that certainty of faith to which we are called.  It is based on a knowable and personal ever growing faith in the one who saved us and who calls us brother, or sister, and friend.  It is based on evidence, and is definable in rational terms which are consistent with God’s own character, of which reason is a part.  The second phrase to which I alluded earlier is “I am persuaded.”  Those three words say volumes about this rationality of God’s Character which Apostle and Archbishop Paul strives to employ in his own life.  Rene Descartes, the great French philosopher, is famous for saying that we should methodologically doubt every proposition to prove its validity, or conversely, its invalidity.  Paul cautions Bishop Timothy to make sound and logical decisions, based on his relationship with Jesus Christ, who is the Church’s Husband, remembering that he- Timothy- is a Bishop of the Church, which is Christ’s Bride.  You see, whatever current societal attitudes may say or teach, we as Christians are called to make our decisions rationally and in a conciliar manner which includes all of the great branches of Christianity, based on the relationship which Jesus Christ offers us through his Church.  Our decisions are never our own, nor do they belong to a committee.  They ought always to be taken within the broader historic Christian community in which we live, and in the shadow of the Cross of Jesus Christ.

Now what does this mean practically?
  1. If something you desire to do, some change you would like to make, is contradictory to what the Church has always believed to be a part of the received body of teaching which characterizes the Scriptures, and the Fathers, and the Councils, and the Doctors, and the Schoolmen, and the Reformers, and all the rest; you are probably making a mistake and should revisit your thought process and the  teaching of the Church over the last 2,000 years before moving ahead.
  2. You should concentrate on verifiable knowledge and formal logical inference, rather than on  feelings.  Feelings are very real things, and they more often than not lead to justification of things which have terrible unintended consequences.  The words “I feel” usually introduce very bad theology which has serious negative consequences, unintended and otherwise.
  3. Because we all live in our own little worlds, it is important that we consult with others, especially other believers of different denominational traditions and from different countries, and with the teachings of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church if we are to honestly think through the implications of our beliefs and their moral and practical implications for us and for others.  
  4. And finally, we should all resist the destructive teachings of this age that there is no ultimate truth based in God’s self revelation of his own character, and that we as individuals are and ought to be the final arbiters of truth in our own lives.  The societal results of such beliefs are anarchy, selfishness, and irresponsibility.  The end of such a story is always tragic, even though none of the players really meant for anyone to get hurt.

And that is all I have today.  It is amazing what can flow out of one little song.  So keep singing, and serve God faithfully, and think about what you do.  Amen.

Saturday, October 18, 2014

Sermon: Knowing and Following God- Exodus 33:12-22- RCL 24A


Moses in the cleft of the rock (Exodus 33:22)

The Jews were a stiffnecked people.  That is the conclusion drawn in the run up to today's Old Testament lesson.  My guess is that is one of the reasons God called them and set them apart- so that the rest of us could identify with them.  Today's lesson is part of a much longer Old Testament narrative which lies at the very heart of the Jewish, and the Christian experience.  It is a tale of bad decisions, and lost opportunities, and forgiveness, and more bad decisions, and exile, and really spicy personal details, and outright rebellion, and selfless love, and judgment, and grace, and oh, did I say forgiveness?  At the beginning of the major section of which today's lesson is a small but important part,  Moses had gone up into the mountain to meet with God.  It was a wonderful meeting, in which God communed with Moses and gave him the ten commandments and detailed directions about how the people should worship and order their community. Moses was there for a while.  The people got restless and began to doubt whether he would ever come back.  In the midst of the uncertainty which seemed to be all around them, their memories of life in Egypt began to look pretty good.  They forgot the bondage and the slavery, and remembered the varied diet, the comfortable homes that were not tents, and the nice things that such a settled life  allowed them to accumulate.  They went to Aaron the Levite, the priest and the brother of Moses, and implored him to make them a god, He called for donations of gold and made them a statue of a calf, and they worshipped it with highly sexualized fertility rites, perhaps like those they had seen in Egypt, or among their Canaanitish neighbors.  Now the Lord looked down and saw what was going on, and he said to Moses, these people have corrupted themselves, and I am going to destroy them, but I will make you a great people.  And Moses prayed from the bottom of his heart that God would have mercy on the people, and God decided not to destroy them.  Now Joshua was up on the mountain trail waiting for Moses, where he had been the entire time.  He met Moses on the path, and as the two of them came into view of the camp, they saw what was going on.  Moses was so angry that he threw down the tablets with the commandments on them and they shattered.  And he took the golden calf and ordered it ground to dust, and scattered in in the water and made all the people drink it.  Considering the biology of it all, I think that is a pretty effective way of saying what you think of a false god.  Then he turned on his brother, the priest, and said, "How could you do such a thing?"  And Aaron was very nuanced- that is to say he lied and blamed it all on someone else, and he minimized his part in the whole affair.  Shame on him and on any priest who does such a thing in every age.  And then Moses stood in the gate of the camp and rallied the faithful, and they stopped the orgy that day by killing three thousand of their neighbors with the sword.  And for their faithfulness to the Lord that day, the Levites, who had refused to defile themselves, were blessed as the keepers of the holy things of God in perpetuity.  And then Moses prayed for the people as he had never prayed before.  As his Lord Jesus and his brother Paul would pray some thirteen hundred years in the future, he offered himself for the sins of the people he loved when he said "O Lord, forgive their sins- and if not then blot me out of the book of life!"  In the passion of his prayer that day, we begin to see the depths of  God's love manifested to us and to all who believe in Jesus the Christ, the Son of the Living God.  And then a plague came upon the people, because every action has consequences, and even when we are forgiven by God we must live with the consequences of our actions.  And then God reaffirmed the promise, the covenant which he had made to Abraham, and had renewed with the other patriarchs of Israel. And God called Moses to enter the tabernacle of Israel that day, and as he did so, the cloud of God's glory, the shekinah, descended upon the holy place to confirm that this was of God.  And Joshua went in with his master, and the people, having learned their lesson for the time being, "rose up and worshipped, every man in his tent door."  And that story brings us to today's Old Testament lesson.

"And the Lord spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh to his friend." (Exodus 33:11)  Moses  asked God to show him the way of the Lord, and shared with him his own fears and insecurities.  And the Lord did speak with him as with a friend. And when God assured Moses of his support and direction and providence, Moses asked to see the very glory of God. And it was a wonderful thing, and God answered his prayer, and the Bible says that the face of Moses shone with the light of the glory of God.  And then the Lord answered Moses' first question, the one about knowing the way of the Lord.  There was another set of tablets made for the commandments, and God gave some very specific guidelines for how the tribes were to honor their relationship with him when they entered the promised land.  And the rest of the book of Exodus is about how the people responded to God's love by obeying him and accomplishing the things he called them to do.

 This brings us to the application of today's text to our lives.  The great drawback to all lectionaries is that they tend to isolate portions of Scripture from their context, that is why the reformers insisted on serial reading of the Bible.  Today you have heard the context of the lesson.  And so you are in a better position to understand it more perfectly.  If I were to read today's lesson from Exodus 33:12-23 apart from its context, I might draw the conclusion that God does communicate directly and passionately with his people, and that he on occasion allows us the  personal experience of his glory.  Now both of those things are true.  But the passage assumes a very different intensity and tone if I realize the complex moral failures which preceded the assigned lesson.  And then when I consider the willingness of Moses to give up his own life for the people, and his anger, and his strong leadership, and all of those other things which are a part of the story- the emotional intensity of God's determination to share with us the experience of his presence and glory are all the more amazing.  My heart cries out with the song writer who said, "And can it be, that I should gain, an interest in my Saviour's love?  Died he for me, who caused him pain, for me who him to death persued?  Amazing love, how can it be, that thou, my God, woulds't die for me?"  I am overcome with emotion and thanksgiving that even after it all, he still accepts us and forgives us and desires intimate fellowship- with us. 

And then in the midst of my wonder and joy, I remember that first question of Moses.  "If I have found favour in thy sight, show me now thy way, that I may know thee, that I may find grace in thy sight: and consider that this nation is thy people." (Exodus 33:13)    I realize with a new sense of urgency that God's grace is given not just that I might feel wonderful or find self-actualization or enhanced self esteem.  God's grace is given that I might be transformed into the image of his grace and mercy, and that I might reflect his holiness by walking in accordance with his attitudes and his standards of personal and corporate behavior all the days of my life.  Certainly there is forgiveness and even rapture in serving our God.  And there is also duty to live a life of personal holiness according to the moral law of God proclaimed to us in the scriptures. 

Some of you may be thinking, "Pursley is a crazy fundamentalist!  The next thing you know he will be calling for the institution of some sort of Christian Sharia law!"  Well, I am a sort of a fundamentalist, if fundamentalism is defined in its original pre-Scopes trial sense of "one who holds the tenets of the creeds absolutely without redefinition and who seeks to accept the faith received from Jesus and the Apostles as understood by the holy fathers."  But I would remind you that Paul clearly states that legalism and works righteousness have no place in our faith.  Obedience however, does.  And I would refer you to page 869 of the Book of Common Prayer, Article VII - Of the Old Testament.  Our Church has always taught that the ceremonial law of the Jews was a prophetic declaration of the character of God and of the coming of Christ.  That is why we do not sacrifice animals or celebrate Seders, even though the Old Testament commands both.  We also teach that the civil law of Israel fulfills those same purposes, and that the code of punishments need not "to be received in any commonwealth." Hence we do not stone people caught in adultery or stone unruly and rebellious young men, even though both were the law in ancient Israel.  "Yet not withstanding, no Christian man whatsoever is free form the obedience of the Commandments which are called Moral."  God's moral behavioural expectations touching our relationship to him and to each other  is the same for Athens and for Jerusalem, now and forever.  As blessed John says in I John chapters one and two,  We have all sinned, and yet Jesus takes care of our sins, and those of all the world.  The evidence that we have been redeemed is that we keep his commandments as written in the word of God, and as we keep those commandments, we are perfected in love, and we truly learn to love each other.

So the end of the matter is this. We are a lot like the ancient Jews, a stiffnecked people.  We have fallen and done some pretty horrible things.  But God loves us and in Jesus Christ he has forgiven us.  He communes with us not as mere subjects or servants, but as friends, and we are given the opportunity to experience him in a way that will transform our outlooks and our behavior as surely as it transformed Moses' visage and caused him to glow with a heavenly light.  Let us now claim our inheritance as the sons and daughters of God.  Let us experience his love and his glory, and his transformation.  And by our commitment to obey his moral law, and by our love for all people and for all he has made, let us proclaim the wonders of his glory to everyone, so that in the end, every knee shall bow, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord!  In the Name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.

Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Giving Back to God: Rector's Rambling- November, 2014


November opens with All Saints' Day and closes with the first Sunday of Advent.  There are so many important things happening in the Church in November.  But for any local parish, perhaps the most important thing, practically speaking, is the annual parish stewardship drive.  It is the engine which drives the parish program and budget for the ensuing year.  Without it, plans are almost impossible to make, and difficult decisions must be made about which programs are the most important, and which ones cannot be sustained.  On the eve of our annual parish pledge request, I thought it would be a good thing to offer a few thoughts about Christian stewardship. 

Stewardship must always be honest.  The reality is that ours, like most of the parishes in the Episcopal Church, is greying and shrinking.  This is not to say that we do not have some wonderful and active young families, or that our older individuals and families do not come and do good and commendable things in this place.  But it is to acknowledge a statistical reality that there are fewer people to pay the bills and to staff the ministries at St. John's than there were a few years ago.  It is also to acknowledge that several of our loved ones who were able to support the church very generously now serve Jesus in a different way and in another place (some of them in heaven.)  It is incumbent on those of us who worship here now to clarify our vision of what God would have our parish to do, and what he would have us to be, and to fund and staff that holy vocation to the glory of God, to the building up of his people, and to the extension of his kingdom.

Stewardship must always be creative.  There are many wonderful traditions in our parish, and we are a traditional denomination.  And there are many things which worked very well in the past which are not so effective today.  Where resources are limited, it is our responsibility to deploy those resources in ways which honor and maintain continuity with our heritage.  It is also our duty to make adaptations where necessity demands that we might be as effective as possible in kingdom work.  Our vestry system of government is an effective tool in evaluating and implementing modifications and improvements in ways that meet our goals and preserve our identity as the people of God called Anglicans.

Stewardship must always reach out to others.  One of the most important acts of stewardship any of us can accomplish is to invite someone to church, and to introduce them to the grace of God the Father, through Jesus Christ the Son, in the power of the Holy Spirit.  Think about who you might invite to a church service, or a parish breakfast, or a Christmas or Easter service, or a Lenten or choir presentation. Be sure to sit with them and invite them out for hospitality following the service or event.

Stewardship must always be sacrificial.  Jesus gave his life to pay for our sins that we might find new life and purpose and healing and joy (and everlasting life!)  All of the Apostles were tortured or killed for refusing to deny the good news that God reconciled us to himself through the sacrifice of Jesus.  Sacrifice is a part of the heritage of the Church.  We are called to go beyond what we can do, or what is comfortable for us to do, in the service of God and in our attempts to share the Gospel with our town.  This sacrifice should push us to offer our time and talents, and should inform our financial decisions about how much we should give to the parish and to other works which proclaim and implement God's plan for all people.

Stewardship must always be motivated by love.  The Bible tells us that "God loves a cheerful giver."  Our giving is most effective in bringing us closer to God when it is motivated by our love for him, for his kingdom, and for our parish home.  To give because we want to is an expression of how we believe and how we feel about our Lord and the people with whom we worship.  Even though I may not agree with every decision or everything which takes place, I love this place because so many times I have met God here.  I love the people and the building, and the garden, and the music, and even the big tree out front.   I wish to share that experience of meeting and knowing him in this particular Anglican Christian way with others- and so I give for the joy of it- for the love of it.  I hope you will do the same.

I humbly entreat all of you, my friends, to prayerfully consider how you would support St. John's in 2015.  Together, we can continue to make a real difference in this place, and bring glory to God, as is our whole duty as his sons and daughters.



Saturday, October 11, 2014

St John Announcements 12 October 2014

St. John Weekly Messenger- 12 October, 2014


Prayer Requests
Sun: The Province of West Africa, Charlie King as he recovers from pneumonia
Mon: Diocese of Ikka in Nigeria, Bonnie Poulson and family at Gordon’s Passing
Tues: Dioceses of Ikko and Ikwerre in Nigeria, Our persecuted brothers and sisters
Wed: Diocese of Ikwauno in Nigeria, pray for the salvation of those who persecute the church
Thurs: Diocese of Ilage in Nigeria, Stuart and Lisa as they serve us all and the cause of peace and stability
Fri: Dioceses of Ile and Oluji in Nigeria, Good citizenship as election season approaches
Sat: Dioceses of Ilesa and Ilesa South West in Nigeria, that this church might be a safe and blessed place for all of the children of God, and all who seek him. For Lori and those who will be trained today.
   
Video Catechism on You Tube: Check out “americananglican: Article 14 Supererogation”


Nursery and Children’s workers are needed to expand our children’s education program. Safe Church Training is available at St. John’s on October 18th at St John’s.  See Fr. Bill or Mark Conrad if you sense a call or would like more information.  Sign up sheet for the course this saturday is at the back of the church!


Daily Office Readings are Year Two, Proper 23, found on page 989 of the Book of Common Prayer.


This Week at St. John’s
Office Hours Tuesday through Thursday 9-12
Today: 9:15 Choir Practice and Adult Forum
Monday: Columbus Day
10:30 at Frank Smith- Gordon Poulson funeral
5:00 Pizza and God Talk at the Church(note time shift)
7:00 Choral Evensong
Wednesday: 10:30 Bible Study II Thessalonians
Noon 1928 Holy Communion
Thursday: 7PM Vestry
Saturday: Safe Church Training- Sign up at back of church or call Fr. Bill at 215-3900
Next Sunday: 8:00 HC I
    9:15 Choir Practice
    9:15 Adult Forum with Bishop NT Wright: The Gospel of John
    10:30 HC II
Remember to put your prayer requests in the alms basin
Confession and Spiritual Direction are available on request- see Fr. Bill



Stewardship Note:  Sometimes people wonder about the Biblical benchmark for financial giving.  Scripture teaches a concept called the “tithe.” It means that within the understanding that all believers should give regularly, proportionally, and sacrificially- a minimum of 10% of our income should be donated to institutions or activities which advance the Kingdom of God.

Friday, October 10, 2014

Sermon for Proper 23 A RCL: Philippians 4:1-9: The Path to Christian Unity

To be preached at St. John's Lancaster on Sunday, 12 October, God willing.

Every competent scholar knows that literary snippets, including those from the Bible, must be considered in their context.  Today's text from Philippians is no exception.  Throughout the Book, St. Paul echoes the prayer of Jesus in John seventeen as he urges Christians to live together in unity, or more specifically to "ta owto pronain in kurio"- to think the same thing, or to be of one mind in the Lord.  We will return to that concept shortly, and unpack its implications by looking at the Apostle's admonition to two ladies in the parish, but before we do, we should consider another canon of sound scholarship.  A good scholar also knows the context in which he speaks or preaches, and anticipates flawed interpretations which are likely to occur among his hearers because of the culture in which they live and the education they are likely to have received.  Based on that knowledge, he or she ought to dispense with those flawed interpretations early so that they do not detract from the exposition which is to follow.  Today's text demands such an approach. 

There are those who would look at Paul's admonition to Euodias and Syntyche and demand that everyone in the church must be in lock step with each other.  I believe there is overwhelming evidence in this letter that such is not the Apostle's intent.  Both women are addressed as active members of the parish, and therefore we can presume that they are both Christians.  In the specific actions and attitudes which are encouraged in the verses which follow, deepening spirituality and growth in grace are encouraged, but wrong theology or rebellion against God are not implied in any way.  It would therefore be rational to infer that the disagreement between the ladies had more to do with personality or opinions regarding non-essentials or ways of accomplishing a task than with the sort of things which would necessarily threaten a person's eternal salvation.  There is room for disagreement in the family of God.  In fact, chapters one and two indicate that in the parish there are very mixed motives for doing things, and while these varying motives might be based to some extent in immaturity or selfishness, they are characteristic of us Christians and do not necessarily mean that we are to be cast out of the kingdom.  People, even Christian people, can be expected to act like people from time to time.  Ours is not a community of plaster saints, but a community of real people with real feelings and opinions and motives, who have named Jesus as Lord and share the road to heaven.

There are others who would extend this picture of our humanity to such a permissible degree in the church that they would allow anything to be said or believed.  The end of such extension is functional universalism, that is that God would not in the end condemn anyone, and that therefore any theological opinion, as long as it is sincere, may be held in the church.  Often, those who hold such an opinion will say something like, "after all, we all worship the same God."  In chapter three, Paul rejects this view and points out that those opinions which would overthrow the efficacy of God's grace given to us in Jesus Christ are evil, and that those who proclaim and practice them are the enemies of the cross of Christ.  Definitions are you see, very important, and we risk our souls if we maintain that words can be redefined or transformed into whatever we wish them to mean.  There is place for some doctrinal disagreement and discussion, but that person who denies the understanding of the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church as contained in the ancient creeds and the consensus of faith actually departs from the orthodox faith received, and proclaims a faith other than that of Christ and his church.  Paul says that we ought to love and pray for such people, and to weep for their lostness, but we ought not to treat with them as if they are our brothers or sisters in the Church of Jesus Christ.  With this in mind, I admonish you in the Name of the Most Holy God: do not travel to hear Bishop John Spong when he comes to the Cathedral in Cincinnati.  He has denied basic elements of the Creeds, and while it might be helpful to hear him speak in a comparative religion class or a philosophy class at the University, he ought not to be given credence in the Church as either an expert or a prophetic gadfly.

But now it is time to return to the disagreement between the ladies and how it ought to be handled.  I think at this point it would be safe to substitute our own names for theirs.  Imagine some time here at St. John's when you have been angry or aggravated with a fellow parishioner over the choice of music, or an element of the service, or a committee decision, or which flowers were on the altar, or how much was spent or not spent on the library, or the garden, or the utilities, or the priest's car, or some other thing which did not directly impact our common belief in the Trinity and the Incarnation of King Jesus.  Paul's admonition ought to characterize our responses in such situations.

Did you acknowledge that both parties in the disagreement were Christians who brought real gifts and faithfulness to the work of God's Kingdom? And were you willing to work faithfully and lovingly with both sides to bring resolution to the issue? That is the message of verse three.

Did you rejoice in the Lord, even when the disagreement, the fight if you will, was going on?  Verse four maintains that that is a must in our parish, because it (or its absence) is an accurate indicator of the attitude which prevails here at St. John's, as it was in Philippi.

In the midst of it all, would the people you spoke with about the problem have said that you were gentle, and that your focus was colored by a firm reliance that God was with us, and that you truly believed that the return of the Lord was near enough to make our immediate reconciliation as the people of God to be truly important?  Verse five makes those points clearly.

Were you willing to turn away from your own anxieties and personal opinions and hurts during the time of unpleasantness and pray with others, including those with whom you disagreed, with the faith that God would lead all of us together to discover a plan that would surpass all of our needs and expectations?  And could you find it in your heart to thankfully anticipate God's answer, and to honestly own the things that really bothered you and pray about the real issues with your brothers and sisters, and not about presentation issues and intellectualized straw men?  That is the message of verse six.

Verse seven goes to the heart of our faith.  Did you really believe that God had the power and desire to bring peace among his people, and were you willing to accept that gift, even if it didn't look the way you had imagined it?

In summary, during the time of disagreement, did you seek to fill your heart and mind with things which were true, and honorable, and just, and pure, and pleasing, and commendable, and excellent, and worthy of praise?  Or did you allow negativity and selfishness and nursed feelings of exclusion or embarrassment or pain or anger to fill your heart and mind?  That is the message of verse eight.

Finally, St. Paul says to us, look at the record of how I have sought to behave among you, and do likewise.  If you set your heart on doing so, the God of Peace will be with you, and will heal your unhappy divisions, and bring you that unity for which our Lord prayed.  That wraps up our second lesson for today.

How did you do the last time around?  I must admit that there have been times when I fell a bit short of the ideal in my dealings with some of you.  I promise that with God's help, I will try harder next time.  I hope you will do the same.  The Bible says that God will bless our efforts, and that he will draw us together in unity and peace.  Join me in believing that he will keep his promise.  As we covenant together to claim his promise as our own, he will send his Holy Spirit upon us to make a wonderful place even better. 

Will you turn with me to page 818, prayer 14, in the Book of Common Prayer, so that we might pray together for God to accomplish this work in our midst.

14. For the Unity of the Church
O God the Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, our only Savior, the Prince of Peace: Give us grace seriously to lay to heart the great dangers we are in by our unhappy divisions; take away all hatred and prejudice, and whatever else may hinder us from godly union and concord; that, as there is but one Body and one Spirit, one hope of our calling, one Lord, one Faith, one Baptism, one God and Father of us all, so we may be all of one heart and of one soul, united in one holy bond of truth and peace, of faith and charity, and may with one mind and one mouth glorify thee; through Jesus Christ our Lord.  Amen.